<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Movies]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/movies</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'movies']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch Japan's Far Less Esoteric Avatar Trailer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_avatar1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Were you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341719/the-first-avatar-trailer-is-big-blue-hyperreal-bliss">still a bit confused</a> regarding the story of Avatar? Do you NEED to know every major plot point of a film before walking in to the theater? Fair enough. Check out this new (English) trailer debuting in Japan.</p>

<p><object width="500" height="409" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://blip.tv/play/hMQ5gaz2PwI%2Em4v">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/hMQ5gaz2PwI%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="409" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><br>
But does anyone else find it a tad too absurd that technology in the world of Avatar can build a hybrid species from a cocktail of DNA but still can't fuse a sub-millimeter fracture in a spinal cord? I know, I know. The construct is no more absurd than a killer robot that can only travel through time <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5163006/why-terminators-always-travel-through-time-naked">naked</a>. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/06/new-japanese-avatar-trailer-features-new-scenes/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
<p><em>UPDATE: Apparently this trailer is playing in other non-US locations, not just Japan.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398613/watch-japans-far-less-esoteric-avatar-trailer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398613]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar trailer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398613&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Subway Ad Makes It Look Like the Tunnel Is About to Collapse]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/2012TheMovie.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_2012TheMovie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This freaky subway ad for upcoming disaster porn 2012 is currently up in Rio de Janeiro's subway systems. Get it, it looks like the tunnels have ruptured and are flooding and everybody is about to die! Ha...ha? [<a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-2012-subway-takeover-would-maybe.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398010/subway-ad-makes-it-look-like-the-tunnel-is-about-to-collapse]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398010]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bad ideas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398010&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lloyd Dobler Gets a Job]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lloyd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lloyd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You can put a guy in a trench coat. You can hand him a boombox blasting Peter Gabriel. You can make even break his heart. But you cannot make him <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lloyddobler" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lloyddobler/">Lloyd Dobler</a>, aka the body overtaken by symbiont <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johncusack" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/johncusack/">John Cusack</a>.</p>

<p>I should celebrate this image, an army of Lloyd Doblers assembling in the name of hope, love and universal rejection of general societal pressure. But I can't help but wonder what Dobler himself would say to hawking copies of Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment's release of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sayanything" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sayanything/">Say Anything</a>... 20th Anniversary Edition</em> in this viral promotion that occurred in NY earlier this week.</p>
<p>"I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as a career. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed. You know, as a career, I don't want to do that."</p>
<p>I guess that, sooner or later, we all sell out a bit. It's OK, Lloyd Dobler impersonators. It's OK. We still really like that song.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398035/lloyd-dobler-gets-a-job]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398035]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john cusack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lloyd dobler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[say anything]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:22:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398035&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Michael Jackson Movie Is Kinda Good]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Screen_shot_2009-11-04_at_6.11.34_PM.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Screen_shot_2009-11-04_at_6.11.34_PM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm not going to admit I teared up a bit when <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #michaeljackson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/michaeljackson/">Michael Jackson</a> sung The Way You Make Me Feel in this movie. Let's talk about the tech for a bit.</p>

<p>I didn't know this, because I live in a bubble, but Michael Jackson was only 8 days away from doing final rehearsals for a 50 show tour, the first in a decade, when he died. This movie, "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thisisit" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thisisit/">This is It</a>" is a cool documentary behind the scenes of the prep ahead of that tour. Since it never happened, it's all we have left of the performer. MJ has always been experimental. This documentary isn't the greatest but it's quite moving to watch the production occur in rough with rough and often amazing performances by the late star. And yes, there was enough tech to keep the Gizmodo sector of my brain engaged.</p>
<p>There were some big pyrotechnics, but I'm not sure they were bigger than the ones that burn down theaters or those used at hair rock band shows that play in football stadiums. There was a cherrypicker that seemed pretty nice, but no big. Same for the toaster-like human poppers that sent people flying into the air like some weird contraption you'd find in a Mario Brothers game in an alternate reality. There was even a display wrapped robot that Michael would emerge from and some light-laced costumes for when Michael sung Billy Jean. All ok, and interesting but my favorite was seeing the refilmed videos, which were to be played in the background while they were being sung. Thriller was redone in a faux cemetery and in 3D (like Captain EO). And Smooth Criminal green screened Michael into an old mobster flick. The Way You Make Me Feel didn't have a filmed segment but a sunset gotham-like skyline as seen through a lattice of iron girders with workers snapping slowly to tempo and climbing down when the song begins. The entire difference between the live and the recorded numbers are that Michael would improvise ever so slightly on catchphrases, and play with the melody, teasing out the pieces by not giving us the exact songs we remember, which at the same time would keep them fresh. He also goes through some old Jackson 5 songs, and it cannot be overstated that the musical numbers are all lifted from live rehearsal, so really fresh. You see Michael Jackson calling the shots on music composition, sets, dances, performance and as he relates to his coworkers the same as any boss, you are reminded of his talent, and in reflection, of our loss that came with his early death. Especially when he dances.</p>
<p>What I'm trying to say is that when you take away the pop and the celebrity scandal, what you're left with is a weird genius. Sort of a geek.</p>
<p>Anyhow, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5215656/thriller-my-first-album">Thriller was my first album</a>, so I enjoyed this movie. Maybe you will, too.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.thisisit-movie.com/">Movie Site</a> with short clips and trailers at <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/michaeljacksonsthisisit/exclusiveclip-large.html">Trailer</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397425/the-michael-jackson-movie-is-kinda-good]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397425]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michael jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michael jackson movie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[this is it]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:16:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397425&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Bundle With Star Trek and Transformers 2 Movies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_custom_1257137132893_Trek-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388075/microsoft-says-no-xbox-blu+ray-drives-period-says-ballmer-was-talking-about-pcs">may or may not</a> be getting that Blu-ray drive, but a new marketing strategy bundles the console with <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></em> or <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #transformers2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/transformers2/">Transformers 2</a></em>.</p>

<p>Confirmed exclusively for the UK at the moment, the packages include an Xbox Elite, an extra controller and the related movie on USB (not DVD). You may also score some extra Microsoft points.</p>
<p>The offer is strange, not just because of the Hollywood branding or the lack of optical media. The offer is strange because Microsoft isn't promoting the free download of either movie through Xbox Live. USB sticks? Really? [<a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36293/New-UK-360-bundles-revealedrn">MCV</a> and <a href="http://www.videogamer.com/news/star_trek_and_transformers_xbox_360_bundles_incoming.html">VideoGamer</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5394845/star-trek-and-transformers-get-elite-bundles">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395045/xbox-360-bundle-with-star-trek-and-transformers-2-movies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395045]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 bundles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:06:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395045&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Great News: No All-New 3D Star Wars]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_vader-3d-glasses.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The rumor is that the greedy all-you-can-sell-and-eat alien entity known in Earth as George Lucas was preparing a new trilogy, all filmed in 3D digital. You can rejoice now, for there won't be any new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwars" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/starwars/">Star Wars</a> movie in 3D:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It wasn't a news item. It was something that somebody made up. It's totally, totally ignorant and stupid, and even the people who picked it up and spread it along, said there's no way this can be true. And of course there's no way it can be true. You shouldn't believe what you read on the internet. Take everything with a big grain of salt.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's what Lucasfilm's Head of Fan Relations Steve Sansweet says about those rumors. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5028874/confirmed-all-6-star-wars-movies-to-be-released-in-3d">only 3D Star Wars movies</a> you will see are the classic trilogy and those three shameful accidents also known as the "prequels."</p>
<p>Or maybe Steve here is just trying a Jedi mind trick on us. Here's hoping he is <i>not</i> lying. [<a href="http://www.moviegeekfeed.com/2009/10/want-to-hear-official-answer-to-those.html">Movie Geek Squad</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5390412/definitely-no-new-3d-star-wars-stupid-says-lucasfilm">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391019/great-news-no-all+new-3d-star-wars]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391019]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trilogy]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391019&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[I Pity the Fool Who Doesn't Want to See the New A-Team]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/a-team.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_a-team.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><i>(Gizmodo's bullpen a few minutes ago).</i> Me: The new A-Team. Liam Neeson will be Hannibal. Brian: What the fuck. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/329935/the-a+team-limousine-chauffeurs-of-fortune">Backlink to the team limo</a>. Me: That's not for posting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Brian: Oh, I think it's postable late at night.<br>
Me: Hahaha, you think that's for posting, you fool.<br>
Brian: They always had gadgets, home made.<br>
Me: That's a streeeeeeeetch. But I'm not going to say no.<br>
Brian: I pity the fool who thinks that's not a post.<br>
Sean: Jessica Biel is in that shit too.<br>
Brian: Yeah, just go with it. It'll feel great.<br>
Me: They better make it good.<br>
Brian: They won't. They will ruin our memories. If T drinks poisoned milk, it will be all good.<br>
Me: Our memories of cheesy TV, yes. We can only hope Mr. T gets a cameo.<br>
Wilson: Yeah, they're second only to MacGyver in postable cheesy 80s TV shows.<br>
Adam: How can anyone play Mr. T? I don't understand.<br>
Me: Me neither.<br>
Adam: Seems like an impossible challenge.<br>
Me: That requires serious acting.<br>
Brian: Yeah, BA Baracus wasn't even a character. He was Mr. T.<br>
Me: I don't think DeNiro would be able to pull that off, much less this dude.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That, dear readers of Gizmodo, is how we spend our afternoons. While we drink cocktails. On the beach. Mixed and served by ninja cyborgs.</p>
<p>A-Team, the movie based on Stephen J. Cannell's famed TV series, is being directed by Joe Carnahan. Liam Neeson will be Hannibal (great choice, although George Peppard will be hard to beat), Sharlto Copley as Murdock, Quinton Rampage Jackson as B.A. Baracus, and Bradley Cooper as Face. Let's hope this remake is as good as the new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5064658/the-new-star-trek-movie-is-hunkarrific">Star Trek</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5390388/i-pity-the-fool-who-doesnt-want-to-see-the-new-a+team]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5390388]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a-team]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390388&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Marvel's Comic Book Creator Is $&@#ing Brilliant]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/wolverinesample.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_wolverinesample.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Marvel's Create Your Own Comic service is designed for kids, but that shouldn't stop you.</p>

<p>The free online app allows you to select between a slew of page layouts, then drag and drop your favorite (mini) Marvel heroes into each panel. Of course can also add text, sound effects objects&mdash;whatever you need to flesh out that 4-part series you've always wanted to see in which a prepubescent Wolverine struggles to uncover the roots of his inexplicably persistent five o'clock shadow.</p>
<p>But the best part is that the whole system is vector based, meaning that you can enlarge any element (like characters) as much as you'd like before exporting your comic to a fairly high rez PDF (that's free from watermarks or any other stuff that could sour the experience).</p>
<p>Though, I must admit, I fear to see what your minds come up with in the comments. Please keep in mind that none of these superheroes are of age. [<a href="http://superherosquad.marvel.com/create_your_own_comic">Marvel</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/create-your-own-comic-book/">GeekDad</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386639/marvels-comic-book-creator-is-ing-brilliant]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386639]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comic books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marvel comic book creator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x-men]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386639&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[R2-D2 Hoodie: Look Like a Short, Stout Droid]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/r2d2-hoodie.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_r2d2-hoodie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Pro tip: there's nothing that gets ladies worked up like seeing a man in an outfit that combines sci-fi references with the laziest article of clothing possible. For only $92, how can you say no? [<a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?ref=vl_other_2&listing_id=32861407">Etsy</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/10/20/r2-d2-hoodie/">Technabob</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385783/r2+d2-hoodie-look-like-a-short-stout-droid]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385783]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clothing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r2-d2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385783&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ecko Star Wars Watches, If You're Not Fett Up Yet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/marceckostarwarswatch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_marceckostarwarswatch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We can only imagine how much money there is to be made on a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5056931/admit-it-the-stormtrooper-hoodie-is-a-little-tempting">$100 geek hoodies</a>, which probably why <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #marcecko" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/marcecko/">Marc Ecko</a>, teamed with Timex, is looking to release a line of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #starwars" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/starwars/">Star Wars</a> watches next.</p>

<p>From the Eck-man himself:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>These are some teasers of my new watch collection. The range is inspired by Star Wars. A mixture of metals, rubbers and nylons. My amazing partners at Timex- completely rocked these. Yes...they feature "indiglo"...sounds...and other technologies. From Boba to R2...Stormtroopers to Vader...</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There's no pricing information at the moment, but the Timex/Ecko mashups will be around this holiday season. You know, so you can buy them and stuff. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385660,3,'Ecko Star Wars Watch Gallery');
</script>[<a href="http://www.beingmarcecko.com/blog/2009/7/20/exclusive-star-wars-x-marc-ecko-watchesholiday-2009.html">Ecko</a> via <a href="http://ablogtoread.com/marc-ecko/star-wars-watches-by-marc-ecko-sneak-preview/">aBlogtoRead</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/10/20/marc-ecko-and-timex-teaming-up-for-a-line-of-star-wars-themed-watches/">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385682/ecko-star-wars-watches-if-youre-not-fett-up-yet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385682]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ecko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ecko star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marc ecko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marc ecko star wars watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[timex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385682&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Life: Think of It As Planet Earth Part II]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lifebbc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_lifebbc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em>Life</em>, the BBC's latest totally unbelievable nature documentary, is airing in 10 episodes between now and Christmas. Not only is the footage as incredible as you'd expect; the studio sent some production notes our way explaining how scenes were shot.</p>

<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRaGZnnepSA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRaGZnnepSA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/CRaGZnnepSA.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>"Filming the bouncing toad was very challenging; the remote mountain plateau is one mile high and 26 square miles in area, whilst the toad is one inch long and very elusive. The tarantulas which prey on them are also very hard to find. To give the crew the best chance of finding and filming them, the expert on these creatures came on the shoot. He searched for a week before the crew's arrival to find both species and a location where they could come together and where the toad would demonstrate its bouncing-ball method of escape. This allowed the cameraman to set up his slow-motion camera in the right place. The scientist was able to ensure that the toad was never in danger of being harmed by the tarantula as a result of us filming them. The technique was a total success - the toad tucked its legs in, rolled and bounced, allowing the crew to film its method of escape in slow-motion detail."</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1vwHvR9jT0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1vwHvR9jT0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/K1vwHvR9jT0.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>"A Jesus Christ lizard running on water is so fast that a human would have to run at 65 miles per hour to achieve the same trick. The speed makes it an enormous challenge to film. After consulting with a scientist at Harvard University who has made a ground-breaking study of the lizard's water sprint, the crew decided that as well as filming the behaviour at normal frame rates they would attempt to capture the close up details of the lizard's run with a slow-motion camera filming at 2000 frames per second (i.e. slowed down by 80 times).</p>
<p>It's very hard to predict exactly where and when a lizard will run, what's more it's all so quick that once the lizard is spotted it's gone in a blur! Learning from the scientist's observation methods was essential and as a result it was decided to film the details of the sprint would need some degree of control to ensure that the crew had some idea of where and when the lizard would run. They travelled to Belize, home of the lizard, to work with local animal experts who had some lizards in natural forest enclosures. If, and when, these lizards decided to run, they always ran along the same stretch of water, where the cameraman could station his camera.</p>
<p>The key to success was using the latest digital slow-motion camera that continuously records into a memory buffer, so that when the cameraman hits the trigger button he downloads the action that took place a second or so before that moment. Whenever a lizard sprinted past the cameraman over the water the cameraman hit the trigger, desperately trying to keep the lizard in the frame and in focus. The final end result of this was stunning, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #slowmotion" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/slowmotion/">slow motion</a> shots of the lizards, with every drop of water visible as they sprinted through the surface."</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_UWOKjfBmy4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_UWOKjfBmy4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/_UWOKjfBmy4.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>OK, we don't actually have any notes on how this was shot. But the macro shot of water beading up on the gecko's hydrophobic skin is gorgeous.</p>
<p><em>The above clips are from Episode 2: Reptiles and Amphibians. The series is playing now on BBC One.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383301/life-think-of-it-as-planet-earth-part-ii]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383301]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bbc life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[planet earth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slow motion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383301&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Iron Man Quits Hero Biz, Takes Up Apprenticeship as Nutcracker]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ironmancracker.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />When Tony Stark finds himself reasonably satisfied with thwarting evil, he'll kick back and casually deploy his suit's intended functionality&mdash;namely, cracking nuts. Make grandma cry at your pagan ways this holiday season for only $30. [<a href="http://nerdapproved.com/approved-products/iron-man-gets-a-nut-cracking-upgrade/">NerdApproved</a> via <a href="http://www.entertainmentearth.com/prodinfo.asp?number=KSIM6801L">EntertainmentEarth</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380533/iron-man-quits-hero-biz-takes-up-apprenticeship-as-nutcracker]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380533]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nutcrackers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man nutcracker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuts]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380533&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Buffy and Hellboy Skins on Apple Products, Dual-Fanboys Ascend to Nirvana]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/hellboybuffy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_hellboybuffy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DARK HORSE COMICS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dark-horse-comics/">Dark Horse Comics</a> (Buffy, Hellboy) and GelaSkins (those dudes who make reusable sticky skins for iPhones, Macbooks, etc) have conceived and birthed a line of products to which all geeks will find themselves un-immune.</p>

<p>Hellboy, Buffy and a bunch of other <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DARK HORSE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dark-horse/">Dark Horse</a> IPs are now available in GelaSkin form (heck, there's even some Bettie Page thrown in there for good measure). iPhone skins go for $15 while 13 and 15-inch Macbook/general laptop skins cost $30.</p>
<p>You've likely seen the iconic art before, but that's alright. I could stare at Sarah Michelle Gellar's estranged cousin for days.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5379594,8,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Search/Browse/GelaSkins/PpwNwkt8">Dark Horse</a> via <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com/2009/10/12/dark-horse-gelaskins/">Lost at E Minor</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379595/buffy-and-hellboy-skins-on-apple-products-dual+fanboys-ascend-to-nirvana]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[buffy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hellboy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone's Cheesy CSI Cameo Requires Serious Suspension of Disbelief]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/iphone-CSI.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_iphone-CSI.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sorry AT&T. I know CSI never lets plausibility get in the way of a good story, but watching them crawl through an underground tunnel and exclaim the iPhone has "outstanding reception", made last night's episode harder to believe than usual.</p>
<p>While that obnoxious gem comes at the 2 minute mark in the video below, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #productplacement" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/productplacement/">product placement</a> begins even before that. Realizing the electrical conduit tunnel is too dark, the dimwitted "PC-like" investigator is handed the iPhone by his cool, like totally hip partner: "There's an app for that!" Yep, it's running a flashlight app. Ugh.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back in reality, AT&T wants you to use <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5363938/att-microcell-3g-heres-why-users-in-known-dead-spots-get-one-free">MicroCell routers</a> to fix its own <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364161/3g-microcells-carriers-want-you-to-pay-extra-to-fix-their-own-failures">reception flaws</a>.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ircH4hwjx60&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ircH4hwjx60&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377875/iphones-cheesy-csi-cameo-requires-serious-suspension-of-disbelief]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[CSI iphone product placement]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[product placement]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Loses <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mightymouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mightymouse/">Mighty Mouse</a> Trademark, Probably Shouldn't Have Used It In First Place...Paramount Asks Moviegoers to RSVP In Advance...AT&T Is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1/" class="posthashtag">#1</a> In Customer Service?...Scary Google Results with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sergeybrin" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sergeybrin/">Sergey Brin</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/340x_Mighty_Mice_.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
You may have heard by now that Apple no longer has claim to the name Mighty Mouse, since small-volume mouse maker Man & Machine, who had labeled its own pointer "Mighty Mouse," managed to wiggle its way through all the red tape to a successful trademark application. There's a lot of messiness involved, but the truth of the matter is a) it was dumb for Apple to borrow a name from a cartoon character in the first place, and b) the Mighty Mouse was one of Apple's worst products to date. In the end, I'm thinking there's a hint of karma in this reversal of fortune. Hopefully <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372793/apple-may-be-working-on-touch+based-mightier-mouse">Apple's next mouse</a> will be mightier in deed than in name. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/mighty-mouse-trademark-awarded-to-man-and-machine-mister-trouble/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Paranormal_Activity.jpg" width="400" height="269"><br>
Even though movie-poster regulars such as Owen Gleiberman and Peter Travers have labeled it "freaky and terrifying" and "a potent frightfest" respectively, studio execs seem skittish about releasing Paramount's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #paranormalactivity" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/paranormalactivity/">Paranormal Activity</a></em>. Instead of manning up and giving it a nationwide release, the studio has asked potential ticket buyers to declare their intentions <a href="http://eventful.com/performers/paranormal-activity-/P0-001-000212499-6/competitions">here</a>. I'm all for crowdsourcing experiments, but this just seems like studio cowardice at its most yeller. They call it "the first-ever major film release decided by you"&mdash;it sure won't be the last. [<a href="http://www.paranormalmovie.com/">Movie Site</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ATT_JD_Power.jpg" width="400" height="261"><br>
iPhone owners love to crap all over AT&T customer service whenever they get near a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jdpower" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jdpower/">JD Power</a> & Associates survey, but apparently, for the 1.5 million who get TV programming from the T, service couldn't be sweeter. Good ole JD released the results, naming AT&T best in the west and south, Verizon tops in the east, and WOW! numero uno in the north central region. (No, World of Warcraft didn't start a cable company... or did it?) It might not startle you to learn that none of the cable and satellite carriers who actually provide TV service to the majority of the nation appear in the (positive) results. Just wait till you serve as many people with TV as you serve with cellphones, AT&T. Then let's see where you stand. [<a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009219">JD Power</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5oCHxB8d20s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5oCHxB8d20s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><br>
<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dannysullivan" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dannysullivan/">Danny Sullivan</a>, king of the search engine watchers, pinned down Sergey Brin after a Google event and showed him some bad results. Like if you type "car rental," all the major agencies are there, but when you type "california car rental," many companies disappear (including my personal favorite, Hertz). He also asked why searching "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #searchengines" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/searchengines/">search engines</a>" brought up discussion of search engines, but "search engine" just brought up many older search sites&mdash;notably excluding Google itself. Brin said people probably don't search for Google on Google, but Sullivan disagreed. I was actually under the impression that if you go to Google and type "google," you break the internet, so in either case, I'm just glad to be enlightened. [<a href="http://searchengineland.com/reviewing-some-bad-google-search-results-with-sergey-brin-27397">Search Engine Land</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377649/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377649]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danny sullivan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power and associates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[man and machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mighty mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paramount pictures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paranormal activity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sergey brin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wow]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377649&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Most Popular Password Is 123456 (Just Like Spaceballs)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/spaceballsnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_spaceballsnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I don't know whether to laugh or cry. With the list of 10,000 email passwords that's been making the rounds following Hotmail/Gmail/etc phishing, Bogdan Calin of Acunetix analyzed the data for real-world trends. The results are shamefully funny.</p>

<p>"123456" was the most popular password, appearing 64 times. Yes, that's but one digit away from this famous Spaceballs clip:</p>
<p><object width="425px" height="360px"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<param name="movie" value="http://mediaservices.myspace.com/services/media/embed.aspx/m=49180515,t=1,mt=video">
<embed src="http://mediaservices.myspace.com/services/media/embed.aspx/m=49180515,t=1,mt=video" width="425" height="360" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></object><br>
Other trends? The next top 20 most popular passwords were Spanish names, just under half the population used all lower case letters, and only six percent of the population used an alphanumeric combination.</p>
<p>Also, about 20% of the passwords were only six characters long...though the longest password was the awesome "lafaroleratropezoooooooooooooo". [<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1557915/top-passwords-revealed">The Inquirer</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377286/the-most-popular-password-is-123456-just-like-spaceballs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377286]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[123456]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[common passwords]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spaceballs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377286&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Movie Theater Tells It How It Is]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/every_time_you_torrent.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_every_time_you_torrent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Nothing shames internet pirates like internet memes turned real. [<a href="http://www.blameitonthevoices.com/2009/10/every-time-you-torrent.html">Blame it on the Voices</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/207531446/morning-links-what-the-world-needs-now-is">The Daily What</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377138/this-movie-theater-tells-it-how-it-is]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[torrents]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch Turbo (That Video Game Movie Shot on a Red One) Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6932347.jpg"></a>A few months back, I wrote about <em>Turbo</em>, a USC graduate thesis shot for under $100K on a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one">Red One</a> camera that used some well-designed effects to capture one potential future of gaming. Now it's online for free.</p>

<p>My favorite guilty pleasure moments? The opening fight scene (the best one, imho) and a moment when the protagonist's head goes through a crane game.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, <em>Turbo</em> manages to cram all of Hollywood's cheesiest motifs into one 20-minute flick. But everything from the visual effects to the cinematography to the fight choreography look pretty freaking good for such a low budget action short. And hey, the plot is still better than any <em>Mortal Kombat</em> and/or <em>Street Fighter movie</em> yet produced.</p>
<p>And if you really dig it, Wonder Woman screenwriter Brent Strickland is shopping around a feature-length screenplay now. [<a href="http://www.turbothemovie.com/">Turbo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376161/watch-turbo-that-video-game-movie-shot-on-a-red-one-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376161]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[turbo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376161&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tony Stark Takes a Load Off at Randy's Donuts]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/iron-man-2_l.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Here's the latest shot from <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IRON MAN 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iron-man-2/">Iron Man 2</a></i>, which, if I understand it correctly, is a prequel about how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TONY STARK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tony-stark/">Tony Stark</a> got his start slinging donuts in suburban Southern California. Can't wait! [<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20308587_20309399,00.html">EW</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5374237/iron-man-2-photo-predators-casting-crazy-doctor-who-and-lost-set-reports-and-action+packed-caprica-footage">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374527/tony-stark-takes-a-load-off-at-randys-donuts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374527]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tony stark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374527&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NEWSFLASH: No One Wants to Pay More for 3D]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/newd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_newd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>OK, <em>some</em> people are willing to pay more for 3D entertainment, but they aren't willing to spend much more.</p>

<p>According to a recent survey by In-Stat, only 43% of respondents who were interested in owning a 3D television to begin with (meaning, a fraction of the real population to begin with) were willing to spend &lt;$200 extra on a 3D-compatible TV. Of the same group, only 33% would pay an extra &lt;$50 for a 3D-compatible Blu-ray player.</p>
<p>But here's the kicker: 67% of those interested in 3D entertainment were willing to spend &lt;$5 on 3D Blu-ray discs. In other words, consumers are willing to pay for a mostly artificial price premium rather than one fully explainable by technical merit. Rape our wallets at will, Hollywood. [<a href="http://www.homemediamagazine.com/3-d/report-consumers-dont-want-pay-more-3d-home-17212">Home Media Magazine</a> via <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2009/10/02/survey-says-consumer-wont-pay-that-much-extra-for-3d/">EngadgetHD</a> and <a href="http://emmatolmie.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/ode-to-the-3d-glasses-and-their-visionaries/">image</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374520/newsflash-no-one-wants-to-pay-more-for-3d]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374520]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[surveys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374520&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Transformers 3 Gets Super Official, Will Explode July 2011]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_Transformers_-Revenge-bigpi.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_504x_Transformers_-Revenge-bigpi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Despite <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a>'s recent press jabs at Michael Bay, the Transformers directors has re-upped and committed to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TRANSFORMERS 3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/transformers-3/">Transformers 3</a>.</p>
<p>Bay also welcomes back Megan Fox, knowing that he'll have a hard time finding someone with just the right balance of slutty sexiness to woo a crowd into believing that Shia is a hero.</p>
<p>Michael Bay should really think about using the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373051/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-kate-beckinsale-at-5k-resolution">Red Epic</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">Red One</a> to shoot Megan Fox with next time. It worked <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-video">well before</a>. [<a href="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/michael-bay-today-officially-signed-on-for-transformers-3-confirms-release-date-of-july-1st-2011/">Deadline</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373262/transformers-3-gets-super-official-will-explode-july-2011]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373262]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers 3]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373262&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Parody: Weta's Special Effects Technology Creates Green Screen Boobage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/WETAmock.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_WETAmock.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Something fun (though NSFW) to end your work week: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PETER JACKSON" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/peter-jackson/">Peter Jackson</a>'s Weta Workshop has provided amazing effects for movies like <em>Lord of the Rings</em>, but can it green-screen naughty bits for indie-film makers? This mock behind-the-scenes look answers that question.</p>
<p>With the over-tanned Access ET intro and all, I thought this may have been real for a half a second. Then I saw it was written and directed by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JOE SWANBERG" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/joe-swanberg/">Joe Swanberg</a>, an indie-film maker known for his preoccupation with digital technology and non-simulated sex scenes. Oh, and it was on: [<a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/7e2d4a6e10/birthday-suit#">Funnyordie</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="320" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" id="ordie_player_7e2d4a6e10"><param name="movie" value="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf">
<param name="flashvars" value="key=7e2d4a6e10">
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true">
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
<embed width="500" height="320" flashvars="key=7e2d4a6e10" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" src="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" name="ordie_player_7e2d4a6e10" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></object></p>
<div style="text-align:left;font-size:x-small;margin-top:0;width:512px;"><a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/7e2d4a6e10/birthday-suit" title="from FOD Team, Jason Lewis, and joeswanberg">Birthday Suit</a> from <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/jason_lewis">Jason Lewis</a></div>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372760/parody-wetas-special-effects-technology-creates-green-screen-boobage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green screen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[joe swanberg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peter jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Weta Green Screen Sex Erections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Books Need to Be Better than Vooks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/vook_gizmodo.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/vook_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a>Yesterday, we explored Apple's discussions with newspaper, magazine and textbook publishers about creating a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370252/apple-tablet-to-redefine-newspapers-textbooks-and-magazines">new type of hybridized media</a> for an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE TABLET" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple-tablet/">Apple tablet</a>. Vooks&mdash;interactive books for the PC/iPhone&mdash;are a telling example of such an idea gone wrong.</p>

<p>Starting today, four Vooks are available for $7 a pop. They're essentially part-book, part-video stories and instructional texts that can link you to social networking sites should you want to fanboy out to your awesome Vook.</p>
<p>While the idea is sound, the product looks no better than a mid-90s encyclopedia on CD.</p>
<p>And it really makes us realize, mixing medias&mdash;especially enhancing text for fiction&mdash;is tricky beyond the mere subject of taste. We're used to watching both news and fart-related video clips on a blog, but embedded flash video is just corny when placed next to a murder mystery.</p>
<p>Part of the challenge is format. UI needs to be updated to something we haven't really seen before&mdash;or maybe even imagined. Jumping across media should be a natural, passive experience. That part seems doable, though extremely difficult, with touch, camera and even voice interfaces. For instance, you could track a reader's eyes to a certain word and activate a sound. You could make a page turn naturally to a full screen video as opposed to relegating clips to an awkward 480x360 box.</p>
<p>But when hybridizing media, the part that could be even tougher is one of budgetary constraints. As soon as a book includes video, a publishing house becomes a production house and a writer becomes a director/editor. Stephen King's prose might send chills up your spine, but the local cable commercial quality video blurb sitting beside it won't have the budgetary love of a Hollywood flick, at least, not unless Stephen King or somebody else is going to take a paycut (or sell a LOT more books).</p>
<p>Advertising books costs money. Printing and distributing books costs money. But writing a book? That part's basically free.</p>
<p>So whatever Apple and publishing houses are cooking up, we hope it's beyond what we've seen in Vooks. No offense, Vook&mdash;someone had to do it (wrong) first. [<a href="http://www.vook.com/">Vook</a> via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/books/01book.html?partner=rss&emc=rss">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372041/apple-tablet-books-need-to-be-better-than-vooks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372041]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hybridized media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372041&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Even the Dark Side Takes the Bus]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/schoolAT_AT.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_schoolAT_AT.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Do you think Vader has time to drive his kids to school? Pfft. He's got an entire evil empire to manage. And on a slightly related side note, just why couldn't AT-ATs hover? [<a href="http://www.cubeecraft.com/blog/photoshop/">cubecraft</a> via <a href="http://superpunch.blogspot.com/2009/09/at-at-school-bus.html">Super Punch</a> via <a href="http://www.gearfuse.com/take-a-ride-on-the-at-at-school-bus/">gearfuse</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5371993/even-the-dark-side-takes-the-bus]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5371993]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at-at]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AT-AT bus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[school bus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5371993&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Blu-ray Improvements on the Horizon: Faster Loads, iPhone Connectivity and IMDB]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/fox_bd_header-550x275.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_fox_bd_header-550x275.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>What does Fox have in mind for improving the experience of Blu-rays? Actually...some really great ideas, according to <a href="Fox%20Home%20Entertainment">SlashFilm</a>.</p>

<p>The most immediate (and maybe most promising) is Live Lookup. It'll be on the Wolverine disc (you know, the same one that has the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370994/blu+rays-to-include-psp+exclusive-digital-copies">PSPgo digital copy</a>).</p>
<p>Live Lookup allows you to hit a button and be linked to IMDB. Actors can be sorted by scene, allowing you to search for bikini shots of cute, female b-listers later. Check it out in the lead photo.</p>
<p>Load times should be diminished or even eliminated, but at a cost. Fox plans to load BD menus while you watch previews. So things may not actually get faster, but you may have more incentive to sit through all that extra promotional material that shouldn't be on a BD in the first place.</p>
<p>Finally, we may even control a BD player through a remote device, like an iPhone. Not only could you search for content without popping a guide up onscreen, but the BD player could stream additional content to this second, personal screen.</p>
<p>These are all great ideas, but hopefully more studios than just Fox will adopt them. Read more of what Fox had to say on the matter over at: [<a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/30/the-future-of-blu-ray-live-lookup-ipod-connectivity-no-more-load-times-and-more/">SlashFilm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5371434/blu+ray-improvements-on-the-horizon-faster-loads-iphone-connectivity-and-imdb]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5371434]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bd players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital copy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imdb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5371434&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[mSpot Streams Movies to iPhones, Blackberries and Palm Pres]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/mspot.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />You could load movies onto your phone. Or you can go to m.mSpot.com on all four major carriers using most smartphones to access $5 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOVIE RENTALS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/movie-rentals/">movie rentals</a>.</p>

<p>You can expect movies a few weeks after they arrive to DVD from current participating studios Paramount, Universal Pictures and the Weinstein Company. The rentals are good for anywhere from 24 hours to 5 days.</p>
<p>Streaming a trailer, the quality wasn't super high (framerates, especially, took a hit). Plus, with iTunes rentals running only $4, it's tough to imagine mSpot taking over (iPhones, at least) entirely.</p>
<p>But a little competition never hurt anyone. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/mobile-phone-movies-from-the-big-screen-to-the-smallest-one/">NYTimes</a> via <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/mobile-phone-movies-from-the-big-screen-to-the-smallest-one/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5371144/mspot-streams-movies-to-iphones-blackberries-and-palm-pres]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5371144]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie rentals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mspot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5371144&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Surrogates Reviewed: Bruce Willis' Robot Hair Is Ridiculous]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/surrogates.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_surrogates.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If your weekend plans include checking out <em>Surrogates</em>, you will be interested to know that io9 thought it was fun despite the weak plot&mdash;and even weaker Willis' robo hair. Check it out if you don't mind the spoilers. [<a href="http://io9.com/5367434/your-iphone-is-rupturing-bruce-willis-spleen">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5367939/surrogates-reviewed-bruce-willis-robot-hair-is-ridiculous]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5367939]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surrogates]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5367939&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Darth Vader Cake Has Dark Side Frosting and a Banana Creme Filling]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/darthvadercake.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_darthvadercake.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This Vader cake, made by the House of Cakes in Dubai, looks amazing. But the fact that it has a banana creme filling? Next level. [<a href="http://www.greatwhitesnark.com/2009/09/22/darth-vader-star-wars-cake/">Great White Snark</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/09/25/darth-vader-cake/">Technabob</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5367893/this-darth-vader-cake-has-dark-side-frosting-and-a-banana-creme-filling]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5367893]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[desert]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[darth vader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Darth Vader cake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5367893&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Five Minutes of Countless Horror Movie Phone Failures]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XIZVcRccCx0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XIZVcRccCx0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>I'd die first in a horror movie. You'd find me, alone, clutching an iPhone and a Blackberry. Or at least that's what my nightmare will be after this compilation of phone failures in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HORROR MOVIES" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HORROR MOVIES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/horror-movies/">horror movies</a>. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIZVcRccCx0">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.nerdist.com/2009/09/a-retrospective-of-movie-phone-fails/">Nerdist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5366425/five-minutes-of-countless-horror-movie-phone-failures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5366425]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones in horror movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[horror movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5366425&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Buy Tony Stark's Arc Reactor for $150]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/arcreactor.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_arcreactor.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ARC REACTOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/arc-reactor/">Arc Reactor</a> is just a replica, so it won't allow you to power a bionic suit that flies around and punches through walls. It will, however, make your desk that much more dorky. And that's something. [<a href="http://www.museumreplicas.com/p-1008-iron-man-arc-reactor-tony-starks-heart.aspx">Museum Replicas</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5366108/buy-tony-starks-arc-reactor-for-150]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5366108]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arc reactor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[props]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tony stark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5366108&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watchmen Ultimate Cut Trumps Director's Cut, Comes Spliced With Black Freighter Footage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Watchmen_Ultimate_Cut.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Watchmen_Ultimate_Cut.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WATCHMEN: THE ULTIMATE CUT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/watchmen%7c-the-ultimate-cut/">Watchmen: The Ultimate Cut</a></i>, arrives none too soon. In fact, kinda late (11/3). If you already bought the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DIRECTOR'S CUT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/director.s-cut/">director's cut</a> on Blu-ray, $60 for a 4-disc set, just to see the <em>Black Freighter</em> "woven" in, may seem steep. [<a href="http://p.p0.com/YesConnect/HtmlMessagePreview?a=2B1xk-q-tUHm0nkxGYS&msgVersion=web">Warner</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5365411/watchmen-ultimate-cut-trumps-directors-cut-comes-spliced-with-black-freighter-footage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5365411]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[director's cut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warner home video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watchmen ultimate cut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watchmen: the ultimate cut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[whv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:22:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5365411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Movie Theaters Will Fry Us All with Infrared to Stop Pirates]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/irwolve.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_irwolve.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You can't shoot a film pirate with bullets, but IR light is just fine.</p>

<p>Sharp, at the request of Japan's National Institute of Informatics, has developed a method to ruin the camcorder footage shot by pirates in movie theaters. By placing mega IR lights behind the screen (which are invisible to the human eye, of course), the light can tunnel through tiny holes that are already in screens for the passage of sound.</p>
<p>The result is a wash of light protruding from the screen, ruining camcorder footage. The other result is that, while you'll still never buy a ticket to <em>Wolverine</em>, you'll never get to know how bad the movie really was until, hungover on the couch one afternoon, you catch it on TBS or something. [<a href="http://www.fareastgizmos.com/other_stuff/ir_light_from_behind_the_cinema_screen_prevents_pirates_from_recording_films_at_movie_theaters.php">Fareastgizmos</a>]<br>
<em><br>
Note: Unfortunately, the IR blast won't look nearly as awesome as it does in this photo. I imagine a lame grid of lights, not a reworking by JJ Abrams.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5364926/movie-theaters-will-fry-us-all-with-infrared-to-stop-pirates]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5364926]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[infrared]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ir movie theaters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:46:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5364926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Netflix to Come to the iPhone "Eventually"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/netiphone.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />I'm not sure it's the most forceful statement ever uttered by a titan of industry, but Netflix's CEO Reed Hastings has expressed confidence that Netflix content will make it to the iPhone&mdash;some day.</p>

<p>When questioned by Reuters if Netflix was working on an iPhone-related partnership with Apple, Hastings responded:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>it's something that's likely to come over time. But nothing in the short term. (With) movie watching, we are not focused on mobile yet, but (instead) on the TV, on Blu-ray and on the video game consoles. We will get to mobile eventually, including the iPhone.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>At first, I looked at Hasting's statement as a false if casual bravado regarding the simplicity of arranging a deal with Apple. But given that both <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334347/slingplayer-11-for-iphone-adds-improved-widescreen-speeds-and-dish-integration">Sling</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5294832/siriusxm-iphone-app-is-now-live">Sirius XM</a> have worked their way onto the platform, it's reasonable to think that Netflix can make it, too. [<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/09/21/netflix-ceo-reed-hastings-on-xbox-youtube-etc/">Reuters</a> via <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090921/netflix-ceo-we%E2%80%99ll-get-to-the-iphone-eventually/?mod=ATD_rss">Digital Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5364504/netflix-to-come-to-the-iphone-eventually]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5364504]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone netflix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5364504&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Is What Happens When a Star Wars Fan Is Loaded]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Apartment_Of_A_Star_Wars_Fan_18.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Apartment_Of_A_Star_Wars_Fan_18.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There are nerds who have their collections on shelves in their apartments, and then there are rich nerds who turn their apartments into an incredible museum of obsession. And this is the craziest version of the latter I've ever seen.</p>
<p>Apparently, this took him 20 years to put together, which is pretty apparent. This takes whatever "impressive" collections of props and replicas I've ever seen and puts them to shame. This is some next-level shit right here. I guess if you're going to live in a fortress of solitude, you might as well make it a badass one.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5362521,18,'Ultimate Star Wars Apartment');
</script> [<a href="http://theoriens.com/the-apartment-of-a-star-wars-fan/">The Oriens</a> via <a href="http://coudal.com/archives/2009/09/dude_likes_him.php">Coudal</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/190660153/this-x-that-graphic-designers-redesign-the">The Daily What</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5362520/this-is-what-happens-when-a-star-wars-fan-is-loaded]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5362520]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[obsession]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apartment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[collections]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars apartment]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5362520&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Army of Darkness Invades the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/3922446959_c0a8dd6b09.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3922446959_c0a8dd6b09.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I can't speak for everyone here, but I have no need for email or bank account transfers on the go. Mobile web browsing is overrated as are thousands of songs in your pocket. But an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ARMY OF DARKNESS IPHONE APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/army-of-darkness-iphone-app/">Army of Darkness iPhone app</a>????????</p>

<p>Today, the iPhone fulfills its Destiny.</p>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ARMY OF DARKNESS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/army-of-darkness/">Army of Darkness</a> Soundboard&mdash;which is completely freakin' free&mdash;plays your favorite soundbites from the famous flick. Lines like "gimme some sugar baby" and "I got news for you pal, you ain't leading but two things right now, jack and shit and Jack left town" can be summoned with the touch of a button.</p>
<p>There's also a photo slideshow mode and the option to delay playback, allowing you to sneak out of the room while Bruce Campbell woos your loved one to "come get some."</p>
<p>Indeed, there are countless apps in Apple's store. But there's just one that's worth a damn(ation). [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=327968018&mt=8">iTunes</a> via <a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2009/09/army-of-darkness-now-theres-an-app-for-that.html">iPhone Savior</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359892/army-of-darkness-invades-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359892]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[army of darkness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[army of darkness iphone app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mgm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359892&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Andy Samberg Explains How (He Thinks) Animation Works]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/AndyHadouken.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_AndyHadouken.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I've no idea what's going on in this behind-the-scenes look at <em>Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</em>, but I like it. The video has script-writing super computers (<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RENDER FARMS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/render-farms/">render farms</a>), mo-cap suit delusions, and even a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STREET FIGHTER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/street-fighter/">Street Fighter</a> Hadouken attack. Fight!</p>
<p>Clearly tongue-in-cheek, and also a fun watch...</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4jHGVfjgWQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x4jHGVfjgWQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357090/andy-samberg-explains-how-he-thinks-animation-works]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357090]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[andy samberg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cloud with a chance of meatballs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motion capture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Render Farms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[street fighter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[viral]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357090&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vudu 1080p Streaming Movies Come to Connected Mitsubishi TVs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/249_Solo2_Lft_610x619.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_249_Solo2_Lft_610x619.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350158/vudu-instant-1080p-streaming-goes-live-on-connected-lg-tvs">LG before them</a>, Mitsubishi is embracing the HD <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STREAMING VIDEO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/streaming-video/">streaming video</a> awesomeness of Vudu with two new HDTVs: A 46-incher at $2600 and one at 52 inches for $3100.</p>
<p>Both 1080p HDTVs include wired and wireless internet connections and a crazy-sounding 16-speaker "sound projector" to really blast those rented flicks. Plus, the Vudu support includes support for YouTube, Flickr, Picasa and Pandora. Like Mitsubishi's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5315775/mitsubishi-hdtvs-to-include-free-vudu-hd-box-and-50-of-movie-credits">previous deal</a>, the purchase of one of these sets comes with a $50 Vudu credit for the first two months. Full press release below. [<a href="http://www.mitsubishi-tv.com/">Mitsubishi</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America Ships VUDU Integrated 1080p Flat Panel LCD Televisions</p>
<p>Unisen™ Diamond Line of Immersive Sound TVs Deliver VUDU's Extensive HD Library In Full 1080p and 5.1 Dolby® Digital Surround Sound</p>
<p>IRVINE, Calif - September 3, 2009 &mdash;- Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, Inc. (MDEA) today announced it has begun shipping VUDU integrated 1080p flat panel TVs in its Diamond models of Unisen™ Immersive Sound LCD Televisions. MDEA will provide the consumer the opportunity to experience the seamless delivery of thousands of high definition movies and TV shows.</p>
<p>Consumers will now be able to enjoy VUDU HD movie content through the unparalleled sensory experience that is delivered by Unisen's superior 1080p picture performance and built-in Dolby Digital® 5.1 surround sound. The Diamond Unisen models, LT-46249 and LT-52249, come equipped with an Ethernet port, which allows for direct connection to the Internet. With the addition of the optional VUDU wireless accessory bridge, consumers can simply link their Diamond Unisen model to their wireless home network to watch the latest in entertainment programming.</p>
<p>"We are always looking to elevate the large screen experience for consumers, and the Mitsubishi VUDU-integrated TVs will combine unprecedented HD program choice with unparalleled picture performance," said Frank DeMartin, vice president of marketing, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America. "Owners of Diamond Unisen Immersive Sound TV's will now have convenient access to high quality entertainment content."</p>
<p>With over 2,200 HD titles and 16,000 titles overall, VUDU offers the most extensive HD movie library available today. In addition, starting later this month, the VUDU service on Diamond Unisen Immersive Sound TVs will offer popular internet services such as YouTube, Flickr, Picasa and Pandora®, as well as an "On Demand TV" area with more than 80 channels to choose from.</p>
<p>"VUDU's extensive HD library of recently released Hollywood titles provides the perfect entertainment solution for Mitsubishi's Diamond Unisen TVs," said Alain Rossmann, CEO of VUDU. "Through this collaboration with Mitsubishi, we are expanding the reach of the VUDU Service to a broad new segment of consumers, providing an outstanding movie watching experience with true 1080p and Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 surround sound."</p>
<p>For a limited time, owners of Mitsubishi's VUDU integrated Diamond Unisen TVs will receive two months worth of free movie rentals or purchases (up to $50.00)*, including SD, HD, and HDX movies, allowing them to experience the extraordinary 1080p image quality and immersive Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound of the VUDU Service running on Mitsubishi Diamond Unisen TVs.</p>
<p>Diamond Unisen Features<br>
In addition to the VUDU streaming capabilities, the Diamond Unisen line of premium flat panel TVs combine ultra compact design, immersive sound technology and advanced video performance to deliver a complete sensory experience without the hassle of complex setup. Each model features an UltraThin Frame™ design delivering a frame measuring less than one inch, fully integrated 18-speaker Dolby Digital 5.1 surround sound system featuring Dual Driver Extended Range Sound, and Variable Smooth 240 Film Motion for viewing of fast and slow moving programs. Diamond Unisen TVs feature wide color gamut backlight technology to reproduce approximately 25 percent more color than most LCD-TVs and both 249 Series models are EnergyStar™ 3.0 qualified.</p>
<p>Availability and Pricing<br>
MDEA has commenced shipping Diamond Unisen models to authorized retailers in the United States. MSRP for the Diamond Unisen products will be $2,599 for the 46" model, LT-46249 and $3,099 for the 52" model, LT-52249.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351311/vudu-1080p-streaming-movies-come-to-connected-mitsubishi-tvs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351311]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mitsubishi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vudu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vudu mitsubishi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351311&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[YouTube to Offer Paid and Ad-Supported New Release Movie Rentals?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_youtube.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125192241524880801.html">Wall Street Journal</a> reports that YouTube is deep in discussions with the movie studios to offer both paid (likely $3.99) and ad-supported movie rentals. This would include new releases, which would be new to YouTube.</p>
<p>Lion's Gate, Sony and Warner Bros are all reportedly discussing such a service with Google (who owns YouTube), although details are thin. Negotiations are still ongoing, so a lot of major issues (will downloads be available? Which films would be ad-supported versus a flat fee? What about TV shows?) are still unresolved. But if YouTube could get a solid, competitive system going, they'd have a fair chance at competing with Hulu, iTunes and Crackle and maybe even turn a profit one of these days. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125192241524880801.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351389/youtube-to-offer-paid-and-ad+supported-new-release-movie-rentals]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351389]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[youtube movie rentals]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351389&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star Trek Returns to IMAX this Friday]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/startrek11.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_startrek11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The latest <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a></em> was a great movie (indisputable fact), but it only had a two-week run at most IMAX theaters because of the summer blockbuster schedule. So it's returning for two more weeks to these 85 IMAX theaters, Friday:</p>

<blockquote>Mesa , AZ – Gateway 12 + IMAX Theatre<br>
Phoenix , AZ – Deer Valley 30 with IMAX<br>
Aliso Viejo , CA – Aliso Viejo Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Camarillo , CA – Camarillo 12 with IMAX<br>
El Dorado Hills , CA – El Dorado Hills Stadium 14 with IMAX<br>
Emeryville , CA – Bay Street 16 with IMAX<br>
Escondido , CA – Escondido Stadium 16 with IMAX<br>
Fairfield , CA – Fairfield Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Fresno , CA – Fresno Stadium 21 + IMAX<br>
Ontario , CA – Ontario Palace Stadium 22 + IMAX<br>
San Diego , CA – Palm Promenade 24 with IMAX<br>
Santa Clara , CA – Mercado 20 with IMAX<br>
Simi Valley , CA – Civic Center Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
South Gate , CA – South Gate Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Stockton , CA – Downtown Stockton 16 + IMAX<br>
Universal City , CA – Citywalk Stadium 19 with IMAX<br>
Westchester , CA – Bridge De Lux 18 + IMAX<br>
Altamonte Springs , FL – Altamonte Mall 18 with IMAX<br>
Aventura , FL – Aventura Mall 24 with IMAX<br>
Cape Canaveral , FL – IMAX Theater<br>
Fort Myers , FL – Gulf Coast Town Center Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Jacksonville , FL – Regency 24 with IMAX<br>
Orange Park , FL – Orange Park 24 with IMAX<br>
Orlando , FL – Pointe Orlando Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Orlando , FL – Waterford Lakes Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
St Petersberg , FL – Baywalk 19 + IMAX<br>
Tallahassee , FL – IMAX Theatre Tallahassee<br>
Tampa , FL – Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI)<br>
Tampa , FL – Veterans 24 with IMAX<br>
Tampa , FL – Channelside Cinemas Stadium 9 + IMAX<br>
Augusta , GA – Augusta Exchange Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Kennesaw , GA – Barrett Commons 24 with IMAX<br>
Morrow , GA – Southlake Pavilion 24 with IMAX Honolulu , HI – Dole Cannery 18 with IMAX<br>
Boise , ID – Boise Stadium 21 + IMAX<br>
Batavia , IL – Randall 14 + IMAX<br>
Lincolnshire , IL – Lincolnshire Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Woodridge , IL – Cinemark 16 + IMAX<br>
Noblesville , IN – Hamilton 16 IMAX<br>
Portage , IN – Portage 15 + IMAX<br>
Louisville , KY – Stoney Brook IMAX<br>
Newport , KY – Newport Levee 20 with IMAX<br>
Harahan , LA – Elmwood Palace 20 with IMAX<br>
Boston , MA – New England Aquarium<br>
Saco , ME – Cinemagic Saco 12 with IMAX<br>
Detroit , MI – Detroit Science Center IMAX Theatre<br>
Grand Blanc , MI – NCG Trillium Cinema + IMAX<br>
Lansing , MI – Celebration – Lansing 19 + IMAX<br>
Sterling Heights , MI – Forum 30 with IMAX<br>
Ypsilanti , MI – Showcase Ann Arbor 20 + IMAX<br>
Roseville , MN – Rosedale 14 with IMAX<br>
Saint Louis , MO – Ronnies Cinemas 19 + IMAX<br>
Charlotte , NC – Stonecrest At Piper Glen Stadium 22 with IMAX<br>
Concord , NC – Concord Mills 24 with IMAX<br>
Council Bluffs , IA – Star Cinema 16 with IMAX<br>
Henderson , NV – Sunset Station Stadium 13 with IMAX<br>
Las Vegas , NV – Brenden Palms 13 + IMAX<br>
Las Vegas , NV – Red Rock Stadium 15 + IMAX<br>
North Las Vegas , NV – Aliante Station 16 with IMAX<br>
Brooklyn , NY – Sheepshead Bay 14 with IMAX<br>
Deer Park , NY – Deer Park Stadium 16 and IMAX<br>
New Rochelle , NY – New Roc City Stadium 18 + IMAX<br>
Williamsville , NY – Transit Center Stadium 18 +IMAX<br>
Columbus , OH – Easton Town Center 30 with IMAX<br>
Springdale , OH – Showcase Springdale 18 IMAX<br>
Bensalem , PA – Neshaminy 24 with IMAX<br>
Homestead , PA – Waterfront 22 with IMAX<br>
Philadelphia , PA – Tuttleman IMAX – Franklin Institute<br>
Tarentum , PA – Pittsburgh Mills Mall 17 + IMAX<br>
Myrtle Beach , SC – IMAX Discovery Theatre<br>
Chattanooga , TN – Tennessee Aquarium<br>
Knoxville , TN – Pinnacle Stadium Cinemas 17 + IMAX<br>
Colleyville , TX – Colleyville Cinema Grille & IMAX<br>
Garland , TX – Firewheel 18 with IMAX<br>
Houston , TX – Gulf Pointe 30 with IMAX<br>
Mesquite , TX – Mesquite 30 with IMAX<br>
Sugarland , TX – First Colony 24 with IMAX<br>
Sandy , UT – Jordan Commons 16 + IMAX<br>
Midlothian , VA – Commonwealth Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Virginia Beach , VA – Lynnhaven 18 with IMAX<br>
Woodbridge , VA – Potomac Mills 18 with IMAX<br>
Kent , WA – Kent Station 14 with IMAX<br>
Lacey , WA – Martin Village Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Hull , QC – Canadian Museum Of Civilization<br>
Victoria , BC – National Geographic Theater</blockquote>
<p>I'm not going to pretend that anyone reading this story would be seeing JJ Abrams' <em>Star Trek</em> for the first time. Or even the second. But in case you didn't get to see Star Trek 3-?? times in the theater, this is probably your best, last chance...ever. Starting September 18th, <em>Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</em> will most likely replace Star Trek. So like we said up top, you have two weeks to see it until the film is rereleased as a Disney classic in 2050. [<a href="http://trekmovie.com/">Trek Movie</a> via <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/01/star-trek-returns-to-imax/">SlashFilm</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/09/02/star-trek-to-return-to-imax-theaters-starting-this-friday/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351082/star-trek-returns-to-imax-this-friday]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351082]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek imax]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351082&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
